Automated site attendance vs manual timesheets

Short answer

Manual timesheets record what someone remembers at the end of the day. Automated attendance records first and last seen, time in each named area and time by category from the card a worker carries, with no clock-in step. It is more detailed, takes no time from foremen, and feeds wages and labour cost directly.

Manual timesheets compared with automated attendance
CriterionManual timesheetsAutomated attendance (SmartSites)
How time is recordedWritten or typed by a foremanCarrying the card onto site starts the record
DetailHours per worker per dayFirst and last seen, time in each named area, time by category
EffortDaily admin for every crewNone after enrolment
ErrorsRounding, missed days, copied entriesGaps are shown; time while a device was offline is marked as estimated
Labour costCalculated later from the sheetsWages calculated from attendance alongside site expenses
Sites without hardwareThe only optionA manual daily timesheet can be kept in the same system

No clock-in

Workers do not tap a reader or open an app. Wearing the card is the clock-in, so attendance does not depend on anyone remembering to record it.

Time by area, not just hours

Because receivers sit in each room or zone, attendance shows where the day went (which trades worked in which areas, and for how long), not just a daily total.

Privacy boundaries

SmartSites only tracks inside the site areas you configure. Productivity analysis from cameras is anonymous and zone-level, never per worker.

Certificates and compliance

The same worker record gives 30 days' warning before a safety certificate expires, so expired credentials are caught before someone is on site.

Ready to build without blind spots?